Иностранный язык (английский яз)

Pros and cons of nuclear power plants

Whether you view nuclear power as the promise for a better tomorrow or a whopping down payment on a mutant filled apoca­lypse, there's a good chance you won't be easily converted to the other side. After all, nuclear power boasts a number of advantages, as well as its share of downright depressing negatives.

As far as positives go, nuclear power's biggest advantages are tied to the simple fact that it doesn't depend on fossil fuels. Coal and natural gas power plants emit carbon dioxide into the atmo­sphere, contributing to climate change. With nuclear power plants, CO2, emissions are minimal.

According to the Nuclear Energy Institute, the power produced by the world's nuclear plants would normally produce 2 billon metric tons of CO₂ per year if they depended on fossil fuels. In fact, a properly functioning nuclear power plant actually releases less radioactivity into the atmosphere than a coal fired power plant. By not depending on fossil fuels, the cost of nuclear power also isn't affected by fluctuations in oil and gas prices.

As for negatives, nuclear fuel may not produce CO2 but it does provide its share of problems. Historically, mining and purifying uranium hasn't been a very clean process. Even transporting nucle­ar fuel to and from plants poses a contamination risk. And once the fuel is spent, you can't just throw it in the city dump. It's still radioactive and potentially deadly.

On average, a nuclear power plant annually generates 20 met­ric tons of used nuclear fuel, classified as high–  level radioactive waste. When you take into account every nuclear plant on the Earth, the combined total climbs to roughly 2,000 metric tons yearly.

      All of this waste emits radia­tion and heat, meaning that it will eventually corrode any container and can prove lethal to nearby life forms. As if this weren't bad enough, nuclear power plants produce a great deal of low-level radioactive waste in the form of radiated parts and equipment.

      Eventually spent nuclear fuel will decay to safe radio­active levels, but it takes tens of thousands of years. Even low-level radioactive waste requires centuries to reach acceptable levels. Currently, the nuclear industry lets waste cool for years before mixing it with glass and storing it in massive cooled, concrete structures. In the future, much of this waste may be transported deep underground. In the meantime, however, this waste has to be maintained, monitored and guarded to prevent the materials from falling into the wrong hands. All of these services and added materials cost money –    on top of the high costs required to build a plant.

      Nuclear waste can pose a problem, and it's the result of prop­erly functioning nuclear power plants. When something goes wrong, the situation can turn catastrophic. The Chernobyl disaster is a good recent example. In 1986 the Ukrainian nuclear reactor exploded, spewing 50 tons of radioactive material into the sur­rounding area, contaminating millions of acres of forest. The disas­ter forced the evacuation of at least 30,000 people, and eventually caused thousands to die from cancer and other illnesses.

Active vocabulary

Try to memorize  the following words and phrases.